ER Law
Psychosocial Hazard Risk Register: A Practical Template for Australian Workplaces
A blank, editable psychosocial hazard risk register with guidance notes - ready to adapt for your organisation. Structured for compliance with the WHS Psychological Health Regulations 2025 and equivalent state.

Workplace Template · Psychosocial Safety
Psychosocial Hazard Risk Register
A blank, editable template structured for compliance with the WHS Psychological Health Regulations 2025 and equivalent state OHS legislation.
By Vrushali Suvarna · HR Specialist | ER/IR Practitioner | Founder, HRWise.com.au
How to use this template
This risk register is designed to be completed by an HR practitioner, WHS officer, or people manager - ideally in consultation with workers. It covers the 14 psychosocial hazard categories recognised by Safe Work Australia. For each hazard category, you will:
- Identify whether the hazard is present in your workplace
- Assess the likelihood and consequence if left uncontrolled
- Calculate a risk rating
- Document existing controls
- Identify additional controls needed
- Assign ownership and a review date
Completing this register does not complete your WHS obligation. The register is the identification and assessment step. Your obligation extends to implementing the controls you identify, monitoring their effectiveness, and reviewing the register regularly or when something changes.
Consult your workers. Regulation 55D of the model WHS Regulations (and equivalents) requires employers to consult with workers when identifying and assessing psychosocial hazards. A register completed without worker input is incomplete as an assessment.
Part A: Risk rating guide
Use the following matrices to calculate your risk rating for each hazard.
Likelihood
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 - Almost Certain | Expected to occur in most circumstances. Workers regularly report this. Evidence of ongoing incidents. |
| 4 - Likely | Will probably occur in many circumstances. Some worker reports. Recognisable patterns. |
| 3 - Possible | Might occur at some point. Occasional worker reports or indirect indicators. |
| 2 - Unlikely | Could occur but is not expected. No recent reports but theoretical exposure exists. |
| 1 - Rare | May only occur in exceptional circumstances. No known reports or indicators. |
Consequence
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 - Catastrophic | Fatality or permanent severe psychological incapacity. Criminal liability for the organisation. |
| 4 - Major | Long-term psychological injury requiring extended time off. Workers' compensation claim. Regulatory investigation or prohibition notice. |
| 3 - Moderate | Significant psychological harm. Short-term incapacity. Workers' compensation claim possible. Reduced team functioning. |
| 2 - Minor | Mild psychological distress. No time off required. Managed with workplace support. |
| 1 - Negligible | Minimal impact. Resolved quickly without ongoing effect. |
Risk rating matrix (Likelihood × Consequence)
| 1 Negligible | 2 Minor | 3 Moderate | 4 Major | 5 Catastrophic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Almost Certain | Medium (5) | High (10) | High (15) | Critical (20) | Critical (25) |
| 4 Likely | Low (4) | Medium (8) | High (12) | High (16) | Critical (20) |
| 3 Possible | Low (3) | Medium (6) | Medium (9) | High (12) | High (15) |
| 2 Unlikely | Low (2) | Low (4) | Medium (6) | Medium (8) | High (10) |
| 1 Rare | Low (1) | Low (2) | Low (3) | Low (4) | Medium (5) |
Risk rating key:
- Critical (15–25): Immediate action required. Cease or substantially modify work if controls cannot be implemented immediately. Notify regulator if relevant.
- High (10–14): Senior management action required. Implement additional controls within 30 days. Monitor closely.
- Medium (5–9): Management responsibility. Implement additional controls within 90 days. Review regularly.
- Low (1–4): Manage through routine procedures. Review at next scheduled assessment.
Part B: Psychosocial Hazard Risk Register
Organisation: _______________________________________________
Workplace / Work Unit: _______________________________________________
Assessment completed by: _______________________________________________
Date of assessment: _______________________________________________
Date of next scheduled review: _______________________________________________
Workers consulted (names or roles): _______________________________________________
Hazard 1: Job demands
Definition: Work that is excessive, complex, or emotionally demanding in ways that exceed what can be reasonably managed. Includes high workload, time pressure, emotional labour (dealing with distressing clients, patients, or situations), and low-control work design.
Guidance note: This is one of the most prevalent psychosocial hazards in Australian workplaces. Indicators include: frequent overtime, workers regularly skipping breaks, high sick leave rates, or customer/client-facing roles with limited recovery time. Performance management processes that are poorly designed or delivered can create acute job demand exposure for the employee being managed.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 2: Low job control
Definition: Limited ability for workers to influence how their work is done, the order in which tasks are completed, or the decisions that affect their work. Includes micromanagement, rigid scripts or protocols with no discretion, and roles with no input into change processes.
Guidance note: Low control is a significant driver of psychological harm when combined with high demands. Remote workers, call centre staff, production workers, and highly procedurised roles are at elevated risk. Review whether supervisory practices inadvertently reduce worker autonomy.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 3: Poor support
Definition: Inadequate practical or emotional support from supervisors and colleagues. Includes poor management practices, lack of feedback, isolation, and absence of peer connection - particularly relevant for remote or hybrid workers.
Guidance note: Support is a protective factor when present and a hazard when absent. New employees, employees on performance processes, and those returning from leave are particularly vulnerable. Supervisor capability in this area is a key control.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 4: Lack of role clarity
Definition: Unclear or conflicting expectations about what a worker is required to do, how performance will be assessed, or how their role relates to others. Includes role conflict, competing priorities, and ambiguous accountability.
Guidance note: Role clarity issues often emerge during organisational change, restructures, or rapid growth. They are also a common underlying factor in performance management situations - a worker cannot be held accountable for expectations they did not clearly understand.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 5: Poor organisational change management
Definition: Change that is poorly planned, communicated, or implemented in ways that create uncertainty, anxiety, or excessive workload for workers. Includes restructures, redundancies, system changes, and leadership transitions.
Guidance note: The SafeWork NSW prohibition notice issued against UTS in September 2025 arose from a restructure process. Change management is not soft management practice - it is a WHS obligation. Workers must be consulted on changes that affect their health and safety, including psychosocial health.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 6: Inadequate reward and recognition
Definition: Work that is not adequately recognised - financially or otherwise - relative to the effort, skill, or contribution required. Includes pay inequity, lack of acknowledgement, and limited career development opportunity.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 7: Poor workplace relationships and conflict
Definition: Interpersonal conflict, incivility, bullying, harassment, or discrimination that creates a hostile or unsupportive work environment. Includes relationship breakdowns between colleagues, or between workers and managers.
Guidance note: Workplace investigations are themselves a psychosocial hazard if poorly managed - for all parties involved, including witnesses. The investigation process needs to be included in your risk assessment, not just the conduct that prompted it.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 8: Remote or isolated work
Definition: Work performed in physical or social isolation from other workers, managers, or the broader organisation. Includes remote work, lone working, travel, night shifts, and work in geographically isolated locations.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 9: Violence, aggression, and trauma
Definition: Exposure to physical or psychological violence, aggression, or traumatic events - including from clients, patients, customers, or members of the public. Includes verbal abuse, threats, physical assault, and vicarious trauma.
Guidance note: High-risk industries include health, disability, community services, retail, hospitality, corrections, and emergency services. A single traumatic incident can have significant impact - and the absence of structured post-incident support is itself a hazard.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 10: Sexual harassment
Definition: Unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that a reasonable person would anticipate might cause offence, humiliation, or intimidation. Includes physical, verbal, written, and online conduct.
Guidance note: The Respect at Work Act 2022 introduced a positive duty on employers to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate sexual harassment, not merely respond to it after the fact. The Australian Human Rights Commission has enforcement powers. A risk register must now include sexual harassment as a distinct hazard - not just a policy reference.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 11: Bullying
Definition: Repeated, unreasonable behaviour directed at a worker or group of workers that creates a risk to health and safety. Includes undermining, exclusion, excessive criticism, and threats. Note: reasonable management action is not bullying even if the employee finds it distressing.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 12: Fatigue
Definition: Mental or physical exhaustion that reduces a worker's capacity to work safely and effectively. Caused by excessive working hours, inadequate rest, shift work, night work, or sustained cognitive demand.
Guidance note: Fatigue is a psychosocial hazard in its own right - not just a physical risk. Rostering practices, on-call obligations, and unpaid overtime are all relevant inputs to this assessment.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 13: Harassment (including on the basis of protected attributes)
Definition: Behaviour that demeans, offends, or intimidates a person because of a protected attribute - including race, sex, age, disability, religion, pregnancy, or sexual orientation. Distinct from sexual harassment (Hazard 10) and bullying (Hazard 11).
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Hazard 14: Poor physical environment (as a psychosocial hazard)
Definition: Physical working conditions that create psychological distress - including noise, temperature, overcrowding, lack of privacy for sensitive conversations, or environments that are demeaning or inadequate for the work required.
Guidance note: This category is particularly relevant for workers who conduct performance, investigation, or welfare conversations in open-plan environments. Lack of a private, neutral space for difficult conversations is itself a psychosocial hazard.
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Is this hazard present? | Yes / No / Partially |
| Evidence or indicators | |
| Who is exposed? | |
| Likelihood rating (1–5) | |
| Consequence rating (1–5) | |
| Risk rating (L × C) | |
| Existing controls | |
| Are existing controls adequate? | Yes / No |
| Additional controls required | |
| Control owner | |
| Target completion date | |
| Review date |
Part C: Summary and prioritisation
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Priority | Control Owner | Target Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Job demands | |||||
| 2. Low job control | |||||
| 3. Poor support | |||||
| 4. Lack of role clarity | |||||
| 5. Poor change management | |||||
| 6. Inadequate recognition | |||||
| 7. Poor relationships/conflict | |||||
| 8. Remote/isolated work | |||||
| 9. Violence, aggression, trauma | |||||
| 10. Sexual harassment | |||||
| 11. Bullying | |||||
| 12. Fatigue | |||||
| 13. Harassment | |||||
| 14. Poor physical environment |
Part D: Review and sign-off
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Assessment completed by | |
| Role / title | |
| Date | |
| Reviewed by (manager/WHS rep) | |
| Date reviewed | |
| Workers consulted | |
| Next review date | |
| Trigger for earlier review | Any significant incident, complaint, workers' compensation claim, restructure, or change in work design |
This template is general guidance only. It does not constitute legal or WHS advice and does not guarantee compliance with any specific regulatory requirement. Organisations should seek independent WHS advice tailored to their industry, workforce, and circumstances. Sources: Safe Work Australia, 'Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work' (2022); WHS Regulations (Psychological Health) 2025; Respect@Work Act 2022. © 2026 Fair Ground - fairground.com.au
About the author
Vrushali Suvarna
HR/ER specialist, HRWise.com.au founder, Flex HR consultant
Vrushali writes about practical employee relations, AI-enabled HR triage, and flexible people support for growing Australian organisations.
Connect on LinkedIn